Advertisement
Bienvenido a Squishdot Reportes Anuncios Debian Ciencia Linux
 principal
 nivel superior
 enviar artículo
 buscar
 administrar
 acerca de ...
 rdf
 rss
 main


Science is Anarchy!
Ciencia Posted by jergas on Thursday May 08, @07:03AM el 2008
from the never mind the bollocks (here's the science pistols) dept.

Feyerabend on Scientific Anarchy In Science and a Free Society (1978)

Feyerabend says in a section containing some autobiographical notes that von Weizsacker (a former student of Heisenberg) has prime responsibility for Feyerabend's change to his anarchistic view. They met in Hamburg in 1965 and discussed the foundations of quantum theory.

Feyerabend complained that alternatives to quantum theory had been omitted, but Weizsacker showed how quantum mechanics arose from concrete research. Feyerabend relates that it then became clear to him that general methodological rules imposed without regard to circumstances are a hindrance rather than a help, and that a person must be given complete freedom with no restrictions by any norms or demands regardless of how plausible they may seem to logicians and philosophers.

Feyerabend concluded that such norms and demands must be checked by research, and not by appeal to ideas of rationality. Thus did Feyerabend come to advocate scientific anarchy.


Please realise that while method must be a choice and not an imposition, this refers to technical methods, not bureaucratic requirements. Read the linked article and revel in the anarchic freedom that has been miraculously bestowed upon you. Now heed the following admonition.

It is a rule (which was properly divulged a few weeks ago) that any missing reports must be entered as soon as possible, and must not be simply appended to the latest reports. I have noticed several reports missing. Please neither risk embarrassment nor make me waste my time by perpetuating a situation which forces me to compile a list of missing reports which I would then have to mail to the boss lady.



Reporte cuasibisemánico: 28abr-2may-8may | reporte  >

 

Related Links
  • Articles on Ciencia
  • Also by jergas
  • Contact author
  • The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

    Re: Science is Anarchy!
    by ernesto on Friday May 09, @04:36PM

    Hola,

    Cagado que en un artículo sobre ciencia que, a mi modo de ver es materialista hasta decir basta, utilicen el término "incommesurability" que es netamente puesmoderno (sic). El término dialéctico es "conflict" (y claro que el lenguaje siempre es conflictivo; eso no lo inventó Derrida). Éste término (conflict)es mucho más responsable y consecuente, creo.

    Por otro lado, gracias por la liga. El capítulo (hasta donde voy) está regüeno.

    Abrazo,

    Ernesto


    [ Reply to this ]
    • Re: Science is Anarchy!
      by jergas on Friday May 30, @07:55AM

      Que bueno que te gusto!

      Me parece que tienes mucho mas "background" que yo en filosofia. Aunque a groso modo entiendo lo que estas diciendo, tu conclusion sale volando sobre mi cabeza. En fin, si surge la ocasion ya me explicaras porque es mas responsable usar conflict.

      Ademas, tendria que revisitar el texto, pero para mi incommensurabiliy y conflict no son ni cercanamente sinonimos. Claro que esto puede tener que ver con el hecho de que para mi inconmesurabilidad es parte del registro tecnico de las matematicas, mientras que conflicto para mi existe mas bien en mi dialecto del lenguage natural. Notaras que en ninguno de los dos casos viene de la filosofia mi entendimiento de esos terminos.


      [ Reply to this ]

     
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

    Powered by Zope  Squishdot Powered
      "Any system that depends on reliability is unreliable." -- Nogg's Postulate
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©1999 Butch Landingin.
    [ home | post article | search | admin ]