principal
nivel superior
enviar artículo
buscar
administrar
acerca de ...
rdf
rss
main
|
 Posted by jergas on Monday December 03, @07:15AM el 2007
from the pedagogical big brother dept.
Hi everyone, I'm happy to say that component one of the plenary 2 survey is almost out the door (and we promised Marcela and David that it would be by 1300 today!).
Quoting David (who has been wonderfully patient as well as quite gracious with his compliments, as you will now see; ahhh, but do click through to get to what I hope is the last round of bug squashing in this component):
In a word, it's BRILLIANT! Thank you so much - the new version does everything I could ask.
The only confusing element was the item "Classification Question 11 (How has research contributed)" - I don't
understand the purpose of this item or why it needs to be visible to the people who are entering their submissions.
If this were removed, the interface with the teachers likely to be submitting their data would be perfect. Thanks to
everyone involved in setting this up.
Pecas, we just need to make sure that component two doesn't bleed through to the "lowest" role.
Please do whatever is needed to implement this as soon as possible.
I guess that the next step is to work out (i) how the submitted data is stored, and (ii) how I can access it for the
purposes of collating the responses. NOTE: We won't know the categories into which the responses will be collated
until we receive the responses. So, there is no need to pre-sort the entered data prior to my accessing it.
Just noticed that when you click "submit" the display includes the data entered for questions: 1, 2, 3, Part B of
question 5, 8, and the three last items, but not the data for questions 4, 5, 6 and 7. I hope this is easily
corrected. I guess the intention is to display all the submitted data - at the moment there are just a few items
that don't get displayed.
Pecas, can we get read of the summary in the preview and/or right after submit? David, if we can we will, but it might be hardcoded into Drupal. If it is, even though Drupal's source is open, we have no chance of understanding it and modifying it in this timeframe. Plus, it is a bit dangerous in a live production environment.
Really it is VERY good.
David
<
El filtro de html...
|
PS2 Drupal
>
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: We're almost there!
by jergas on Monday December 03, @07:21AM
|
Well, I am sorry, but Squishdot (our forum software) removed the [em] emphasis tags that made the quoting visually distinctive. As I cannot modify the post afterwards, you will just have to use the context to distinguish my comments from David's.
Vic, is there any way to fix that? Wierd! Can you explain this strange functionality that is triggered by the square brackets here?
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Re: We're almost there!
by Víctor Martínez on Monday December 03, @08:20AM
|
Yes it's not a bug it's a feature... well a not wanted feature... when squishdot was flooded with spam last year I had to implement and mix two different hacks that appeared on the user-list of the program, these hacks mess with the html filter... so it happens that NOW as a result the filter is really nasty and don't allow most of html...
Anyway since last year we have moved the squishdot to a not so common port got to get the original filter as last week have read a lot from it eating tags.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Fix squishdot
by Victor Martinez on Monday December 03, @01:53PM
|
|
Done... I imagine that when our last zope admin migrate from version to the current one lost some settings... also I have a hard time searching as it's supposed to be default on our current version.
Fixes the htmlfilter that was eating tags
Took more time than must have, but I was very sure that these settings would have been SET on our site by default, at least where when I have the squishdot on linux.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
Re: We're almost there!
by The campaign on Monday December 03, @11:14AM
|
Ok, I'm joining to this effort.
Squishdot sucks!
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Re: We're almost there!
by The campaign on Monday December 03, @11:49AM
|
Classification Question 11 was my mistake and it will disappear right now, the component two doesn't bleed to the lowest role
I'm on my way but it will be very hard to complete this task by the 13:00 hrs GTM-6, we do not have the required modules installed on the production server, this is mandatory just to start moving it :-(, and if you ask me I would prefer to synchronize all the sites before going to production stage this is becoming a maintenance nightmare, Vic are you there?
In relation with the question 4,5,6,7 the fields are not being displayed since they are not being registered :-( ,thanks for notice this bug, as you can imagine this is not a minor bug and should be corrected before proceeding with anything else.
My local copy displays them correctly, so I hope to get this fixed very quicky since I think it has something to do with some misconfiguration at Remote Drupal
I will change the preview as optional,the Submit doesn't have any summary just the confirmation "Your Plenary Session 2 Survey has been created."
I'll keep you posted, stay tuned and be patient.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Re: We're almost there!
by Victor Martinez on Monday December 03, @02:37PM
|
To keep all updated.
Ricardo and I are working on put all the code on the production site, as anyone can see, we're behind Edgar's ETA. But we're working hard.
We expect to have more news soon.
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
Re: We're almost there!
by The campaign on Monday December 03, @08:03PM
|
I finally moved all the plenary session stuff to icme11.org, but ...
I'm sure it isn't perfect, please recreate your users (if you do not own a user at icme11.org) and test again.
In particular the bug with the questions 5,6 and 7 was not trivial since I did not realize that I should build a one to many relationship among the tables to fit the requirements of these questions
I'm a bit disappointed that Drupal did not explicitly warn me about this omission because I've lost many hours to see my own stupidity :-(, the future data will be contained into four tables not one.
I've tried to add the latest comments and bug fixes into the current version, but once again I could be wrong, I encourage you to fully test the system before going to production stage
Once logged in Go to http://icme11.org/node/add/ps2
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
Re: We're almost there!
by David Clarke on Monday December 03, @08:14PM
|
|
All the email exchanges sound very encouraging.
Let me know when and where there is something I should be looking at.
Thanks again to everyone.
David
|
[
Reply to this ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The following
comments are owned by whoever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
We're almost there!
